diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 6ce6ba4..37c9e14 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 ## About
 
-Static avr-libc library providing basic support for RFM95 radio modules.
+Static avr-libc library providing basic support for RFM95 (SX1276) radio modules.
 Other RFM9x radios might work as well, but were not tested yet.  
 
 I'm impressed how well these radio modules work; the range achieved with 
@@ -35,21 +35,24 @@
 
 ### LoRa
 
-With LoRa, reception was stable with about -125 dBm at almost 7 km distance 
-somewhat line of sight, with the following configuration (and as well just 
-simple wire antennas):
+With LoRa, reception was stable with an RSSI of -111 dBm and +15 dBm Tx power at 
+over 12 km distance line of sight, with the following configuration (and as well 
+just simple wire antennas):
 
-- Output power: +17 dBm
 - LNA highest gain, boost on, 150% LNA current
-- Signal bandwidth: 62.5 kHz
+- Signal bandwidth: 41.7 kHz
 - Error correction code rate: 4/5
-- Spreading factor: 9
+- Spreading factor: 10
 - Low Data Rate Optimization
 
+![FieldTest5](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f1d0ec2-f95d-472f-9510-919c16c1f7f6)
+
 So, LoRa seems to perform significantly better than FSK - as expected - but FSK 
-probably can go further than 2.7 km under similar conditions.
+certainly can go a lot further than 2.7 km under similar conditions (plain line of sight).
 
 Anyway, these radio modules work very well with both modulation schemes!  
 
-![Transmitter placement](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0579ce09-9a47-4a64-8224-680413c7764e)
+Here's the transmitter placed at Mont-Saint-Aubert, with a nice view to Mont de L'Enclus,
+were the receiver was located:
 
+![Transmitter](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ef7898a-f510-4f30-ab93-302a0ff44af7)