diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index a7d6b60..aa7ab1b 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -29,10 +29,31 @@
 almost 2.7 km distance - with simple wire antennas, and a low hill in between.  
 
 Compared to the [RFM69](https://github.com/gitdode/librfm) at +13 dBm, it does 
-make it a few hundred meters further  - seems fair enough!  
+make it a few hundred meters further - seems fair enough!  
 
 ![FieldTest4](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/67f745c4-a47f-4cb1-a278-547a0b0e01e3)
 
 ### LoRa
 
-ToWalk 😅
+With LoRa, reception was stable with about -125 dBm at almost 7 km distance 
+somewhat line of sight, with the following configuration (and as well just 
+simple wire antennas):
+
+- Carrier frequency: 868.6 MHz
+- Output power: +17 dBm
+- LNA highest gain, boost on, 150% LNA current
+- Signal bandwidth: 62.5 kHz
+- Error correction code rate: 4/5
+- Spreading factor: 9
+- Preamble length: 12 symbols
+- Explicit header mode
+- CRC on
+- Low Data Rate Optimization
+
+So, LoRa seems to perform significantly better than FSK - as expected - but I'm 
+quite sure FSK can go further than 2.7 km under similar conditions.
+
+Anyway, these radio modules work very well with both modulation schemes!  
+
+![Transmitter placement](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0579ce09-9a47-4a64-8224-680413c7764e)
+